fprintf(fplog, "%s\n", hline);
gpu_cpu_ratio = tot_gpu/tot_cpu_overlap;
- fprintf(fplog, "\n Force evaluation time GPU/CPU: %.3f ms/%.3f ms = %.3f\n",
+ fprintf(fplog, "\nForce evaluation time GPU/CPU: %.3f ms/%.3f ms = %.3f\n",
tot_gpu/gpu_t->nb_c, tot_cpu_overlap/wc->wcc[ewcFORCE].n,
gpu_cpu_ratio);
* but we currently can't check that here.
*/
md_print_warn(NULL,fplog,
- "NOTE: The GPU has >25%% less load than the CPU. This imbalance causes\n"
+ "\nNOTE: The GPU has >25%% less load than the CPU. This imbalance causes\n"
" performance loss. Maybe the domain decomposition limits the PME tuning.\n"
- " In that case, try setting the DD grid manually (-dd) or lowering -dds.\n");
+ " In that case, try setting the DD grid manually (-dd) or lowering -dds.");
}
else
{
* too small for increasing the cut-off for PME tuning.
*/
md_print_warn(NULL,fplog,
- "NOTE: The GPU has >25%% less load than the CPU. This imbalance causes\n"
- " performance loss.\n");
+ "\nNOTE: The GPU has >25%% less load than the CPU. This imbalance causes\n"
+ " performance loss.");
}
}
if (gpu_cpu_ratio > 1.2)
{
md_print_warn(NULL,fplog,
- "NOTE: The GPU has >20%% more load than the CPU. This imbalance causes\n"
- " performance loss, consider using a shorter cut-off and a finer PME grid.\n");
+ "\nNOTE: The GPU has >20%% more load than the CPU. This imbalance causes\n"
+ " performance loss, consider using a shorter cut-off and a finer PME grid.");
}
}
}